Scanifly alternatives are design and site-survey tools you can use instead of Scanifly, a US design and field platform built around drone surveys. Aurora Solar ranks first at 76.5/100. PV*SOL premium ranks second at 71.5/100.
With Scanifly, crews fly a site, upload the photos, and get a 3D model with shading. It also offers remote designs from satellite and LiDAR (laser height) data, plus outsourced plan sets (permit drawing packages).
Installers look for Scanifly alternatives for four reasons. Scanifly publishes no prices, design work runs on credits, and drone surveys and design services cost extra. Its most detailed models need a drone flight, by your own crew or as a paid service. It is US-focused, with no stated service abroad. And it has only 3 G2 reviews, so there is little user evidence to judge it by. For a ranked list across every segment, see our best solar design software ranking.
Scanifly at a glance
Item | Scanifly (checked October 2026) |
|---|---|
What it is | Remote (PrelimDesign) and drone-based (DroneDesign) 3D site modelling, shading, a mobile survey app and outsourced plan-set services |
Pricing | Quote only ("Book a Demo"). Design work is credit-based. Drone surveys and design services cost extra |
Free plan / trial | No free plan. The mobile app is free for account holders. Demo only |
Ratings | G2 4.7/5 (3 reviews, no visible text). No Capterra listing found |
Who it still suits | US installers with drone-equipped crews who want measured 3D models and onsite shading |
Source: Scanifly, checked October 2026. Read our full Scanifly review.
Quick picks
Rank | Product | Best for | Starting price (company page, checked October 2026) | Free plan / trial | Score /100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Remote US home design, no drone | ✓ USD 159/user/month | No free plan. Trial not confirmed | 76.5 | |
2 | European 3D shading on desktop | ✓ EUR 845/year per user + VAT | 30-day trial | 71.5 | |
3 | Bankable yield for C&I and utility | ✓ CHF 700/year | 30-day evaluation | 67.5 | |
4 | C&I roofs from drone images in CAD | Quote only | Demo only | 66.7 | |
5 | Free remote design | ✓ Free core platform | Free plan | 66.4 | |
6 | Commercial design up to 30 MW DC | ✓ USD 159/month | Free trial (length not stated) | 65.3 | |
7 | Utility-scale siting and design | Quote only | Demo only | 65.2 | |
8 | Ground-mount layouts on terrain | Quote only | Demo only | 63.1 | |
9 | Pay-per-report roof measurement | ✓ 60 per report (residential. USD assumed) | None | 62.3 | |
10 | European all-in-one from drone or satellite | Quote only | Demo only | 59.5 |
✓ Verified on the company’s own pricing page. ◐ Published by the company outside its pricing page (help centre, store or press release). ? We could not read the company’s pricing page, so the figure is not confirmed. Prices checked October 2026.
Quote only means the company shows no public price. You ask it for a quote.
How the 10 tools scored
- Use-case fit 35%
- User reviews 20%
- Pricing 15%
- Ease of use 10%
- Support 10%
- Momentum 10%
Tool | Score chart | Score |
|---|---|---|
76.5 out of 100 | 76.5 | |
71.5 out of 100 | 71.5 | |
67.5 out of 100 | 67.5 | |
66.7 out of 100 | 66.7 | |
66.4 out of 100 | 66.4 | |
65.3 out of 100 | 65.3 | |
65.2 out of 100 | 65.2 | |
63.1 out of 100 | 63.1 | |
62.3 out of 100 | 62.3 | |
59.5 out of 100 | 59.5 |
Each bar shows the weighted score out of 100.
Sub-scores at a glance (0-10)
Product | Use-case fit | User reviews | Pricing | Ease of use | Support | Momentum | Total /100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7.5 | 7.9 | 8.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 76.5 | |
7.5 | 5.4 | 8.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 71.5 | |
5.8 | 6.3 | 8.0 | 5.0 | 7.5 | 10.0 | 67.5 | |
5.8 | 6.4 | 4.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 7.5 | 66.7 | |
5.8 | 5.0 | 9.0 | 7.5 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 66.4 | |
6.7 | 6.2 | 8.0 | 7.5 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 65.3 | |
5.8 | 6.9 | 4.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 10.0 | 65.2 | |
5.8 | 8.3 | 4.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 5.0 | 63.1 | |
6.7 | 5.5 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 62.3 | |
5.8 | 6.6 | 4.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 5.0 | 59.5 |
A 5.0 on reviews, ease, support or momentum is our neutral value where public evidence is thin, not a judgement.
How did we score these Scanifly alternatives?
How the score is weighted
- Use-case fit 35%
- User reviews 20%
- Pricing 15%
- Ease of use 10%
- Support 10%
- Momentum 10%
From 22 to 25 October 2026 we scored Scanifly and 13 rivals from company pages, price lists and user reviews. We did not test them hands-on. The 10 best rivals are ranked below. Scanifly is the benchmark, not a contender.
- Use-case fit (35%): How well a tool does Scanifly’s job: layout, 3D site models, shading and site survey.
- User reviews (20%): Ratings on G2, Capterra and Trustpilot. Fewer than 8 reviews earns a neutral 5/10.
- Pricing (15%): Published prices beat quote-only.
- Ease of use, support and momentum (10% each): Review sub-scores and dated releases.
Services such as outsourced plan sets are not scored as software. SurgePV is not part of this ranking. Read the full method.
1. Aurora Solar: best for remote US home design without a drone
Best for: US residential and light-commercial crews who want good roof models without a drone on every job. Score: 76.5/100.
vs Scanifly: Aurora builds site models remotely, with LIDAR on Premium, and prints its prices. Scanifly’s best models need a drone flight and a quote.
What it is: Aurora Solar Inc. runs this cloud platform for design, shade studies and proposals. Its main users are US home and light-commercial installers.
Why we picked it: It scored highest here, with strong reviews (4.7/5 from 121 on G2) and a good fit for remote site models. Its prices are public.
Key features:
- LIDAR-assisted (laser height data) 3D modelling on Premium.
- Shade analysis, with bankable (lender-accepted) shade reports on Premium.
- On-demand and AI-assisted site models.
- Drone mapping on Enterprise.
- Proposals with financing, including tax-credit estimates (US credit rules change, check current law).
Pricing: Basic costs USD 159 per user per month, or USD 135 billed annually, for 50 projects a month. On-demand site models cost from USD 9.99 each. Premium costs USD 259 per user per month, or USD 220 billed annually. Enterprise is custom and priced per project. Checked October 2026 on the Aurora Solar pricing page.
Pros (from user reviews):
- Reviewers say LiDAR reveals obstructions and the shade figures hold up (Capterra).
- Accurate designs and good support get praise on G2.
- Its how-to videos and help centre make training easier (Capterra).
Cons (from reviews and our research):
- LIDAR and bankable shade reports need Premium, at USD 259 per user per month.
- Drone mapping sits on the custom Enterprise plan only.
- A G2 reviewer wants better links to other software.
Reviews: G2 4.7/5 (121 reviews) and Capterra 4.1/5 (7 reviews), checked October 2026.
What we could not confirm: Any free trial.
Read our full Aurora Solar review or our Aurora Solar alternatives.
Want to see Aurora Solar working? Book a demo with the SolarSoftwares team.
Book a demoYour request goes by email to the SolarSoftwares team. A time is set only after we reply. It does not change any score or ranking.
2. PV*SOL premium: best for European 3D shading on desktop
Best for: European installers and planners who model shading, batteries and heat pumps in detail. Score: 71.5/100.
vs Scanifly: PV*SOL premium has a published yearly licence and works outside the US. It models shading in a desktop 3D scene and has no drone service of its own.
What it is: Germany’s Valentin Software makes this PC program for 3D design and yield simulation of home and C&I systems.
Why we picked it: It ties Aurora Solar for the best fit score here, thanks to its detailed 3D shading. Its price is public, with a 30-day trial.
Key features:
- 3D design with detailed shading analysis.
- Yield simulation with Meteonorm 9 climate data.
- AC- and DC-coupled batteries.
- Heat pump and EV loads with per-consumer tariffs.
Pricing: EUR 845 per year per named user plus VAT, or EUR 285 for three months. The 2D PV*SOL costs EUR 585 a year. Checked October 2026 in the Valentin shop. 30-day trial.
Pros (from reviews and our research):
- You know the full cost before you buy, with no credits to track.
- Ease of use scores 8.2/10 on G2 (10 reviews).
- A fresh 2026 version shipped on 24 November 2025.
Cons (from our research):
- It runs on a desktop, not on a phone at the site.
- It has no survey app or drone capture, so site data comes from elsewhere.
- Licences are per named user.
Reviews: G2 4.2/5 (12 reviews), checked October 2026.
Read our full PV*SOL premium review or our PV*SOL alternatives.
Want to see PV*SOL premium working? Book a demo with the SolarSoftwares team.
Book a demoYour request goes by email to the SolarSoftwares team. A time is set only after we reply. It does not change any score or ranking.
3. PVsyst: best for bankable yield on C&I and utility jobs
Best for: Engineers and EPCs (firms that design and build solar plants) who need yield reports in the format lenders’ advisors expect. Score: 67.5/100.
vs Scanifly: PVsyst does not capture sites. It takes a 3D shade scene and gives P50/P90 yield reports (yield you can expect at set odds), which Scanifly does not claim.
What it is: Swiss firm PVsyst SA makes this Windows simulation program. Engineers, EPCs and consultants use it as the reference for yield reports. It is not a sales or proposal tool.
Why we picked it: It turns a 3D shade scene into the yield reports that lenders’ advisors ask for. Its yearly price is public, with a 30-day evaluation.
Key features:
- 3D near-shading scene with electrical mismatch losses.
- Detailed loss diagram and P50/P90 reports.
- Bifacial modules (panels that catch light on both sides) and trackers with backtracking.
- Weather data from Meteonorm 9, PVGIS, NSRDB, Solcast and more.
Pricing: PVsyst 8 Professional costs CHF 700 a year per seat. Multi-seat discounts run up to 20% for 10 or more licences. Student and Classroom licences cost CHF 25 a year. Checked October 2026 in the PVsyst shop. 30-day evaluation.
Pros (from user reviews):
- Modelling and yield simulation are detailed and accurate (G2).
- Loss analysis is thorough (G2).
- SketchUp links help build 3D shade scenes (G2).
Cons (from user reviews):
- Reviewers call the interface outdated and complex (G2).
- It is hard to learn (G2).
- Managing 3D scenes takes time (G2).
Reviews: G2 4.5/5 (22 reviews), with ease of use 6.7/10 and support 7.7/10, checked October 2026.
Read our full PVsyst review or our PVsyst alternatives.
Want to see PVsyst working? Book a demo with the SolarSoftwares team.
Book a demoYour request goes by email to the SolarSoftwares team. A time is set only after we reply. It does not change any score or ranking.
4. PVcase Roof Mount: best for C&I roofs from drone images in CAD
Best for: C&I EPCs and engineering teams who design commercial rooftops in AutoCAD. Score: 66.7/100.
vs Scanifly: PVcase turns drone images and DWG/DXF files into roof geometry, then adds full electrical design. You keep your drone, but you do the capture yourself.
What it is: PVcase Roof Mount is an AutoCAD-based rooftop design tool from PVcase, based in Lithuania. It covers layout, ballast (weights that hold panels on a flat roof), stringing (how panels wire into inverters), cabling and SLDs (single-line diagrams). It is not aimed at homes.
Why we picked it: It is one of the few tools here that works from drone images, as Scanifly does. G2 users rate its ease of use and support very highly.
Key features:
- DWG/DXF and drone-image conversion into roof geometry.
- Layout around setbacks, parapets and obstructions.
- Stringing, MPPT setup, cable sizing and voltage drop.
- SLD and BOM (bill of materials) export, plus PVsyst export.
- PanelClaw ballast reports in Eurocode countries.
Pricing: Quote only. There is one Professional plan, and you request the price. Checked October 2026 on the PVcase Roof Mount pricing page.
Pros (from user reviews):
- Reviewers say it saves time (G2).
- It works inside AutoCAD, which CAD teams already know (G2).
- Support gets top marks, at 9.8/10 on G2 (16 reviews).
Cons (from our research):
- You need a sales call to get a price.
- It is built for C&I, not home sales.
- Ballast reports cover Eurocode countries only.
Reviews: G2 4.6/5 (17 reviews), with ease of use 9.1/10, checked October 2026.
What we could not confirm: Whether you need a separate AutoCAD licence.
See our PVcase alternatives.
Want to see PVcase Roof Mount working? Book a demo with the SolarSoftwares team.
Book a demoYour request goes by email to the SolarSoftwares team. A time is set only after we reply. It does not change any score or ranking.
5. OpenSolar: best free Scanifly alternative
Best for: Home and small commercial installers who want remote design with no licence fee. Score: 66.4/100.
vs Scanifly: OpenSolar’s core design tool is free and works in many countries. It uses imagery, not drone surveys, so there are no credits to buy.
What it is: OpenSolar Inc. offers design, proposal and sales tools free of charge, paid for by hardware and finance partners. The company says it is used in 160+ countries.
Why we picked it: It is the only free tool on this page, with remote design and shading. Its small review base (3 on G2) held its score back.
Key features:
- Free 3D and 2D rooftop design with shading.
- AI design in OS 3.0.
- Optional premium imagery.
- Web proposals with e-signature.
Pricing: The core platform is free. Since 16 April 2026, API access (usage-based, with a 30-day free trial) and the Xero and QuickBooks connectors are paid. Rates are not published. Checked October 2026 on the OpenSolar notice.
Pros (from reviews and our research):
- Moving panels around is easy, one reviewer says (G2).
- Its interactive app is handy on site (G2).
- You can test remote design on real jobs at no cost.
Cons (from user reviews):
- Auto designs need an engineer’s review before install (G2).
- The interface feels dated (G2).
- Paid add-ons mean it is "not completely free" (G2).
Reviews: G2 4.8/5 (3 reviews), checked October 2026.
What we could not confirm: How deep its shading engine goes beyond the company’s marketing pages.
Read our full OpenSolar review or our OpenSolar alternatives.
Want to see OpenSolar working? Book a demo with the SolarSoftwares team.
Book a demoYour request goes by email to the SolarSoftwares team. A time is set only after we reply. It does not change any score or ranking.
6. HelioScope: best for commercial design up to 30 MW DC
Best for: C&I designers who want fast commercial layouts with a published price. Score: 65.3/100.
vs Scanifly: HelioScope gives commercial layouts and loss models from USD 159 a month, with LIDAR and AI obstruction detection on Pro. Scanifly is quote only.
What it is: HelioScope is a web tool for commercial PV design and simulation, owned by Aurora Solar Inc. It handles rooftop, carport and ground-mount projects up to 30 MW DC (megawatts of direct-current panel power).
Why we picked it: It has public prices, LIDAR on Pro and fast commercial layouts. G2 users rate its ease of use 8.8/10.
Key features:
- Rooftop, carport and ground-mount layout.
- Shading and wiring-loss modelling.
- LIDAR and AI obstruction detection on Pro.
- P90, P95 and P99 values (cautious yield estimates) on Pro.
Pricing: Basic costs USD 159 a month, or USD 1,620 a year if billed yearly, for 1 user, 10 projects a month and up to 1.25 MW DC. Pro costs USD 259 a month or USD 2,640 a year, up to 5 MW DC. Enterprise is custom, up to 30 MW DC. Checked October 2026 on the HelioScope pricing page.
Pros (from user reviews):
- Its simple screens are quick to learn (G2).
- Users get fast, accurate layouts with shading and wiring losses (G2).
- Reports and SLDs take little time (G2).
Cons (from user reviews):
- The subscription is expensive for occasional users (G2).
- Project limits get in the way on large systems (G2).
- Users in India and Mexico say it defaults to US units and prices (G2).
Reviews: G2 4.5/5 (19 reviews), with ease of use 8.8/10 and support 7.9/10, checked October 2026.
Read our full HelioScope review or our HelioScope alternatives.
Want to see HelioScope working? Book a demo with the SolarSoftwares team.
Book a demoYour request goes by email to the SolarSoftwares team. A time is set only after we reply. It does not change any score or ranking.
7. RatedPower: best for utility-scale siting and design
Best for: Developers, EPCs and IPPs (independent power producers) who design large ground-mount and storage plants. Score: 65.2/100.
vs Scanifly: RatedPower screens land from maps and data, not drone flights. It suits large plants where Scanifly’s rooftop focus does not.
What it is: RatedPower is a cloud platform for utility-scale PV, battery and hybrid plants, from an Enverus company. It covers siting, layout, yield, electrical design and cost studies.
Why we picked it: It has the second-largest review base here (305 on G2), with strong ease-of-use and support marks. It also covers large ground sites that Scanifly does not.
Key features:
- Site screening with parcel, substation and transmission maps (selected regions).
- Rule-based layout with setbacks, roads, slope and cut-and-fill.
- 3D ray-traced yield with terrain shading.
- MV/LV (medium and low voltage) design, SLDs and substation engineering.
Pricing: Quote only. Basic, Advanced and Enterprise tiers are listed with no prices. Checked October 2026 on the RatedPower pricing page.
Pros (from user reviews):
- Ease of use is the top pro, with 22 mentions (G2).
- Feasibility layouts are fast, and electrical diagrams are automated (G2).
- Reviewers praise the support team (G2).
Cons (from user reviews):
- Land and constraint handling in layouts could be better (G2).
- Not every BESS-PCS (battery and power conversion system) combination is available (G2).
- Design options are limited for custom drawings (G2).
Reviews: G2 4.4/5 (305 reviews), checked October 2026.
Read our full RatedPower review or our RatedPower alternatives.
Want to see RatedPower working? Book a demo with the SolarSoftwares team.
Book a demoYour request goes by email to the SolarSoftwares team. A time is set only after we reply. It does not change any score or ranking.
8. PVcase Ground Mount: best for ground-mount layouts on real terrain
Best for: Engineering teams who design ground-mount and tracker plants in AutoCAD. Score: 63.1/100.
vs Scanifly: PVcase Ground Mount follows terrain and adds civil design such as grading and piling. Scanifly is built for roofs and smaller sites.
What it is: PVcase Ground Mount is a CAD-based layout, civil and electrical design tool from PVcase. Developers, EPCs and engineering firms use it.
Why we picked it: It has a 4.7/5 rating on G2. It covers terrain and civil design for ground sites, which Scanifly does not.
Key features:
- Terrain-following layouts for fixed tilt and trackers.
- Slope, grading heatmaps, cross-sections and piling analysis.
- Stringing, cable sizing and SLDs.
- Shading and irradiance analysis with QuickYield.
Pricing: Quote only. One Professional plan, with a demo on request. Checked October 2026 on the PVcase Ground Mount pricing page.
Pros (from user reviews):
- Users say automated layouts save many hours (G2).
- It runs in AutoCAD and exports shade scenes to PVsyst (G2).
- Slope and terrain tools are strong, and support usually answers within a day (G2).
Cons (from user reviews):
- Users want more automation in SLDs and cable sizing (G2).
- It is expensive for small and mid-sized firms (G2).
- New users need training (G2).
Reviews: G2 4.7/5, checked October 2026. A G2 search listing shows 415 reviews, while the company cites 479.
Read our full PVcase Ground Mount review or our PVcase alternatives.
Want to see PVcase Ground Mount working? Book a demo with the SolarSoftwares team.
Book a demoYour request goes by email to the SolarSoftwares team. A time is set only after we reply. It does not change any score or ranking.
9. EagleView: best for pay-per-report roof measurement
Best for: US installers who want roof measurements and shade values without a drone or site visit. Score: 62.3/100.
vs Scanifly: EagleView sells roof reports from aerial images at a set price per report. It replaces Scanifly’s site survey, not its design tools.
What it is: EagleView is an aerial-imagery company that sells roof reports and pre-built PV designs per job. Roofers, insurers and US solar installers use it.
Why we picked it: It is the only tool here with a public price per report, and it replaces the site visit. Its 44 Capterra reviews give a fair base to judge from.
Key features:
- Roof reports with pitch, azimuth (compass direction) and obstructions.
- TSRF (total solar resource fraction) and solar access values on Inform Advanced.
- TrueDesign pre-built PV designs for sales or planning.
- DXF, JSON, XML and PDF files, plus a link to Aurora Solar.
Pricing: Residential Inform Essentials+ costs 63.25 per report (Bronze) or 60 (Silver and Gold). Inform Advanced costs 79 or 75. TrueDesign for Sales costs 20 to 30 per design, and for Planning 85 to 105.50. The page shows a dollar sign without naming the currency. We assume USD, as the service is US only. Checked October 2026 on the EagleView pricing page.
Pros (from user reviews):
- Measurements are accurate, and reviewers rarely have problems (Capterra).
- Reports come fast, with no site visit (Capterra).
- It links with AccuLynx (Capterra).
Cons (from user reviews):
- It is expensive for small jobs, with value for money at 3.7/5 (Capterra).
- New builds and tree cover cause gaps (Capterra).
- Reviewers report hold times and billing disputes (Capterra).
Reviews: Capterra 4.3/5 (44 reviews) and G2 3.6/5 (14 reviews), checked October 2026. Many of these reviews may come from roofers rather than solar installers.
Want to see EagleView working? Book a demo with the SolarSoftwares team.
Book a demoYour request goes by email to the SolarSoftwares team. A time is set only after we reply. It does not change any score or ranking.
10. Reonic: best for European all-in-one design from drone or satellite
Best for: European installers who want design, CRM (software that tracks leads and customers) and project tools in one system. Score: 59.5/100.
vs Scanifly: Reonic builds 3D roof models from satellite, orthophoto or drone scans and works in Europe. Like Scanifly, it is quote only.
What it is: Reonic is an all-in-one installer platform from Germany for solar, storage and heat pumps. It sells mostly in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, and also has a UK and Brazil presence.
Why we picked it: It is one of the few tools here that builds roof models from drone scans, and it works in Europe. Trustpilot users rate it 4.5/5 from 33 reviews.
Key features:
- 3D roof model from satellite, orthophoto or drone scans, with auto-layout.
- Shading from nearby buildings, trees and roof obstacles.
- Hourly yield forecast per module.
- Proposals with e-signature, CRM and project tools.
Pricing: Quote only, with "Book a demo" and no prices. Checked October 2026 on the Reonic product page.
Pros (from user reviews):
- A UK user calls the design screens clean (Trustpilot, March 2026).
- UK users rate the onboarding highly (Trustpilot, March 2026).
- Fast proposals helped sales (Trustpilot, Germany, September 2024).
Cons (from our research):
- No prices until you book a demo.
- Services like grid registration are limited to Germany.
- We found reviews on Trustpilot only. There is no G2 listing.
Reviews: Trustpilot 4.5/5 (33 reviews), checked October 2026.
See our Reonic alternatives.
Want to see Reonic working? Book a demo with the SolarSoftwares team.
Book a demoYour request goes by email to the SolarSoftwares team. A time is set only after we reply. It does not change any score or ranking.
SurgePV (unscored): for readers comparing roof modelling, array layout and proposals in one browser project. Compare required imports, design depth and local outputs on your own project. The numbered scores above do not include it.
Sources checked 27 October 2026: SurgePV product information · SolarSoftwares SurgePV review
Book a demo of SurgePV with the SolarSoftwares team.
Book a demoYour request goes by email to the SolarSoftwares team. A time is set only after we reply. It does not change any score or ranking.
How do the 10 Scanifly alternatives compare?
This table shows what changes when you leave Scanifly.
Product | Entry price (checked October 2026) | How the site is captured | Shading output | Segment | Main regions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quote only, credits | Drone photos, or satellite, Nearmap and LiDAR | Onsite Viewshed shading | Residential, C&I | US | |
USD 159/user/month | LIDAR and on-demand site models. Drone mapping on Enterprise | Bankable shade reports (Premium) | Residential, light commercial | US | |
EUR 845/year + VAT | Desktop 3D scene | Detailed 3D shading | Residential, C&I | Europe | |
CHF 700/year | 3D shade scene import | P50/P90 yield | C&I, utility | Global | |
Quote only | DWG/DXF and drone images | Shading and irradiance | C&I | Global | |
Free | Imagery | Rooftop shading | Residential, small commercial | Global | |
USD 159/month | LIDAR and AI detection (Pro) | Shading, P90/P95/P99 (Pro) | C&I | US, global | |
Quote only | Map and land data | 3D ray-traced yield | Utility | Global | |
Quote only | Terrain data in CAD | Shading, QuickYield | Utility, C&I | Global | |
60/report (USD assumed) | Aerial images | TSRF, solar access | Residential, C&I | US | |
Quote only | Satellite, orthophoto or drone scans | Shading from nearby objects | Residential, C&I | DACH, UK, Brazil |
Also considered
- Solargraf: Scored 58.9/100. It gives US permit plan sets on every plan from USD 2,799 a year, but has no drone capture and a Capterra rating of 3.2/5. See our Solargraf alternatives.
- SolarPlus: Scored 58.8/100. It has 3D shading with tree modelling, but it is focused on Australia and New Zealand and has one G2 review.
- Solmetric SunEye-210: Scored 53.4/100. This handheld shade tool costs USD 2,195 one-off, but it is out of stock with a 10-12 week lead time. See our SunEye alternatives.
How do you choose a Scanifly alternative?
- If you left Scanifly because of credit costs, pick Aurora Solar for US homes or OpenSolar if you want free.
- If you have no drone or field crew, pick Aurora Solar, or buy EagleView reports per job.
- If you still fly drones on commercial roofs, pick PVcase Roof Mount, or Reonic in Europe.
- If you work outside the US, pick PV*SOL premium, OpenSolar or Reonic.
- If a lender’s advisor needs P50/P90 numbers, pick PVsyst.
- If your work is ground-mount or utility-scale, pick RatedPower or PVcase Ground Mount.
For wider lists, see our site survey apps, roof measurement software and shading analysis software rankings, and the design and simulation category.
Want more choices? Browse every tool we checked in our design and simulation category.
How do you switch from Scanifly?
- Export first. Download your site models, photos, CAD files and shade reports before your access ends.
- Use up your credits. Finish open designs so paid credits are not wasted.
- Decide on capture. Choose drone, satellite, LIDAR or roof reports, and set this up before your first job.
- Run a parallel job. Model one or two sites in both tools and compare the layout and shade results.
- Check approvals. If a lender or regulator accepted Scanifly’s onsite shading, ask whether the new tool’s output is also accepted.
Scanifly alternatives FAQs
What is the best alternative to Scanifly?
Aurora Solar is the best Scanifly alternative in our October 2026 ranking, at 76.5/100. It builds models remotely with LIDAR on Premium, from USD 259 per user per month. PV*SOL premium is the top pick for European designers.
How much does Scanifly cost per design?
Scanifly does not publish prices. As of October 2026, its site offers "Book a Demo" only. Design work runs on credits, and drone surveys and design services cost extra. Expect to book a demo to get a number.
Do I need a drone to replace Scanifly, or can satellite imagery do the job?
Not always. Aurora Solar builds site models remotely and EagleView sells roof reports from aerial images, with no drone. Image gaps still happen, and EagleView reviewers note gaps for new builds and tree cover (October 2026).
Is Scanifly better than Aurora Solar?
For crews who fly drones on every job, Scanifly’s DroneDesign is built for that. For most home installers, Aurora is easier to budget, with prices from USD 159 per user per month. It also has 121 G2 reviews against Scanifly’s 3 (October 2026).
What replaced the Solmetric SunEye for shade analysis?
The SunEye-210 is still listed at USD 2,195, but it was out of stock with a 10-12 week lead time in October 2026. Scanifly’s own site calls it "the new SunEye". EagleView’s Inform Advanced gives TSRF and solar access values in select US states without a site visit.
Is there a Scanifly alternative outside the US?
Yes. PV*SOL premium serves Europe, and Reonic covers Germany, Austria, Switzerland and the UK. OpenSolar says it is used in more than 160 countries. PVsyst, RatedPower and the PVcase tools are used worldwide on larger projects (checked October 2026).
Sources
All read 22 to 25 October 2026.
- Scanifly: site, product updates, G2
- Aurora Solar: pricing, G2, Capterra
- PV*SOL premium: shop, G2
- PVsyst: shop, G2, G2 comparison
- PVcase Roof Mount: pricing, G2
- OpenSolar: pricing notice, G2
- HelioScope: pricing, G2
- RatedPower: pricing, G2
- PVcase Ground Mount: pricing, G2
- EagleView: pricing, Capterra, G2
- Reonic: product, Trustpilot
- Also considered: Solargraf pricing, SolarPlus pricing, SunEye-210 store
Last updated 28 October 2026. Next scheduled review: 23 January 2027.